government
Best Moments from the #GOPDebate!
Donald Trump enters pic.twitter.com/fn53ByhQWm
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) December 16, 2015
Carson holds moment of silence for the San Bernadino victims.
Paul wrecks Rubio over NSA spying and immigration.
Paul doing Cruz’s work for him here. Brutal takedown on immigration and national defense. pic.twitter.com/bb19WkCaoc — Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) December 16, 2015
Trump SMOOCHES Cruz on stage!
Cruz owning the moderators! #GOPDebate
— Kelly Campagna (@warriorwoman91) December 16, 2015
Cruz destroys Rubio on immigration!
Ted Cruz did his best Babe Ruth imitation again tonight. 🙂 #GOPDebate #CruzCrew @TedCRuz pic.twitter.com/YQnQBA7Xkv — Chuck Nellis (@ChuckNellis) December 16, 2015
Bush: You can’t insult your way to the presidency. Trump: WATCH ME!
Trump to Jeb pic.twitter.com/SR9BE2Mryn
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) December 16, 2015
Trump complains that the media talks about him too much and HULK SMASHES Jeb Bush!
Trump vs. Bush #GOPDebate pic.twitter.com/l2LvHek0LO — Kelly Campagna (@warriorwoman91) December 16, 2015
Debate winner: Darth Vader
I will force choke all terrorists #GOPDebate pic.twitter.com/Klrst0rJBL
— Darth Vader (@DepressedDarth) December 16, 2015
How to Talk to A Liberal: Federalism Prevents the Abuse of Power
One of the features of the Constitution designed to protect individuals from the abuse of power by government is the creation of federalism. Federalism is the sharing of sovereignty between the states and the national government, sovereignty being, “the ultimate authority to govern […],” (Patterson, 2008, p. 69). This structure of government was innovated for the purpose of creating a strong national government for the United States, while still providing restraints to enable the states to maintain some of their sovereignty. By dividing authority between these two entities, federalism creates a check and balance system between federal and state governments to prevent an abuse of power. According to Alexander Hamilton, “If [the people’s] rights are invaded by either, they can make use of the other as the instrument of redress,” (Patterson, 2008, p. 71).
This feature of the Constitution has been the cause of much debate in several prominent Supreme Court cases over the past 5 years. For example, in 2012 the Supreme Court struck down an Arizona immigration law attempting to take federal law enforcement into the state’s hands, (Washington Post, 2012). Another example is found in the 2013 Supreme Court decision regarding California’s Proposition 8 banning gay marriage inside the state’s borders. The court refused to take up the case, thereby, “[leaving] in place a lower court’s decision that the ban is unconstitutional,” (Washington Post, 2013). Both of these controversies have opened up a national dialogue as to where states’ authority ends and federal authority begins.
References
Barnes, R. (2012, June 25). Supreme Court upholds key part of Arizona law for now, strikes down other provisions. Washington Post. Retrieved January 15, 2014, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court-rules-on-arizona-immigration-law/2012/06/25/gJQA0Nrm1V_story.html.
Barnes, R. (2013, June 26). At Supreme Court, victories for gay marriage. Washington Post. Retrieved January 15, 2014, from http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court/2013/06/26/f0039814-d9ab-11e2-a016-92547bf094cc_story.html.
Patterson, T. E. (2008). The American Democracy. New York City, New York: McGraw-Hill.