milo yiannopoulos
Why Twitter Is Better Than Facebook
I’ve often complained that my FaceBook experience is far inferior to the fun and games we all have on Twitter, so I thought I’d elaborate on just what exactly makes Twitter so much better than FaceBook.
Twitter is open
Probably the best example of why Twitter is a superior platform to FaceBook is it is an open network. The premise of Twitter is that unless you have a protected account—and who wastes their time with those—everything you post on Twitter is visible to anyone and everyone else on the Internet. Twitter is your own little broadcast network that can be as big or as small as the effort you put into it; therefore it is a given that personal, sensitive, or intimate material is posted at your own risk. In contrast, FaceBook is the Soviet Union of social networking—unless you have an active following virtually no one can see your content due to FaceBook’s limiting and restrictive algorithims. The rules that must be adhered to and the hoops that must be jumped through in order for the average person to grow their network are nearly impossible to overcome, and many would say it’s just not worth the effort. This idea that social networking should or can be limited to you and just your personal friends is contrary to its purpose, as the sharing of ideas and information should be allowed to go far beyond your immediate sphere of influence.
Twitter is impersonal
This is a huge (or yuge if you’re Donald Trump) advantage that Twitter has over FaceBook. Somehow I always feel obligated to respond to people on FaceBook even if I don’t want to for fear of offending someone. Other times, I feel I have to think and rethink what I’m about to post on FaceBook, wondering if this post might offend this person or seem inappropriate to that person. Still other times I really would rather not be friends with a particular person, yet I might offend him or her by unfriending or blocking whomever it is on FaceBook. It the social justice warrior’s dream where everyone has to walk on eggshells to prevent people from being offended, or suffer the consequences! With Twitter there is none of this flip-flopping over what I want to post or who I unfriend or unfollow—it’s not personal, so I don’t have to care.
Twitter levels the playing field
This is my favorite part of Twitter—the fact that I get to digitally meet and exchange ideas with people that in any other circumstance I would never get a chance to communicate with. Imagine a Californian getting to connect with conservatives in other states, a U.S. based college student sharing ideas with a British celebrity, or an average fan of a T.V. show getting to communicate with one of its actors. These are only a few of the ways that Twitter has broken down the traditional barriers between the middle class and the elite that FaceBook and it’s elaborate barriers only work to reinforce.
Twitter is a free for all
Anything, and I mean anything, goes on Twitter. If the U.S. would loosen the restrictions on its economy the way Twitter has allowed most information sharing to be unrestricted, we’d be going gangbusters! It is universally understood by most Twitter users that you are undoubtedly going to see everything offensive—whether it’s an opinion you dislike or a picture with graphic content—and that’s the nature of the free for all. FaceBook would restrict all content which it subjectively determines to be offensive in pursuit of some fascistic utopia where no one gets offended and no one really has any contact with other ideas. Unfortunately, with PC fears beginning to encroach on Twitter the free for all may not for much longer. So if I could give one piece of advice to Twitter I would ask that it continue to be the opposite of everything that FaceBook stands for by loosening restrictions and facilitating the unlimited exchange of ideas.
Milo Yiannopoulos & Rebecca Reid – “Have We Reached an Age of Gender Equality?”
Recapping the Great Election between @BenShapiro and @Nero (Guess Who Won!)
It was a dark and stormy night…well it was last Sunday evening when I realized the most haunting question that every Breitbart binge reader [like myself] wants answered: Shapiro or Yiannopoulos? Thus began the great showdown between the two Titans.
Vote in the big showdown between @benshapiro and @nero! Ben’s currently got a crushing lead! https://t.co/zxhedl1YtJ
— Kelly Campagna (@warriorwoman91) November 16, 2015
@warriorwoman91 fiend! I admire them both! This poll is pure evil. 😜❤️❤️ @benshapiro @Nero
— Misty Callahan (@MistyACallahan) November 16, 2015
The stakes were high–the winner of this great election would be forever known as the king of Twitter and would henceforth be referred to as “his excellency.” Even from the beginning Twitter fans were aghast at the daunting task set before them: to choose between the man who shapiroed Piers Morgan right off of CNN or the man who wipes the floor with feminist faces on a daily basis.
@warriorwoman91 @benshapiro @Nero Who is the evil person that is even forcing us to choose. I live in the West where things are awesome.
— Deviant Sophist (@DeviantSophist) November 16, 2015
@warriorwoman91 @benshapiro @Nero Why isn’t there an “All of the above” option? This is too hard!
— Cameron Hovenkamp (@HovenkampC) November 16, 2015
Seeing as how my followers tend to favor our dear leader Ben Shapiro, it was no surprise that early polling placed him in a startling lead over Yiannopoulos. When I reached out to @Nero for comment he seemed unusually willing to concede to Shapiro…but this of course was all part of his devious plan.
I graciously concede to @benshapiro on this one. https://t.co/gpnyGzAASA
— Milo Yiannopoulos (@Nero) November 16, 2015
Shapiro himself did not seem to see himself as the clear winner this early on in the game considering Yiannopoulos’ royal heritage.
Fairly certain the British accent puts @Nero over the top. https://t.co/uuAnW8QRJK
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) November 16, 2015
Then the election went gangbusters as each side pulled out all the stops in the attempt to prove who was more popular on Twitter. Fans evaluated hair length, eyebrows, hair style, upper lips…oh yeah and debate skillz.
The mudslinging continues as the great @benshapiro makes his bid to unseat @nero & claim the title “his excellency.” https://t.co/zxhedl1YtJ
— Kelly Campagna (@warriorwoman91) November 16, 2015
Ben Shapiro hands down! But Milo has better hair. https://t.co/0VsZ9ZVahK
— Atheist_Elanor (@Atheist_Elanor) November 16, 2015
@warriorwoman91 @benshapiro Hmm. It all comes down to the upper lip for me, and @Nero has it.
— BL_Abba (@BL_Abba) November 16, 2015
@warriorwoman91 I’m going with @benshapiro, and obviously my vote has nothing to do with hair, because @Nero wins that battle hands down.
— Trevor Norris (@TNorrisYEG) November 16, 2015
@warriorwoman91 @benshapiro @Nero Them eyebrows though.
— Atheist_Elanor (@Atheist_Elanor) November 16, 2015
@Atheist_Elanor @warriorwoman91 @benshapiro @Nero I say Milos @nero hair needs its own twitter account. But Shapiros debating skills tops
— Mariella Madrid (@MariellaMadrid) November 16, 2015
Suddenly the great election of 2015 took a turn in the other direction, and Yiannopoulos began pulling ahead so fast he had to apologize to Shapiro for knocking him over on the way.
Sorry about it @benshapiro https://t.co/gpnyGzAASA
— Milo Yiannopoulos (@Nero) November 16, 2015
IT WAS UNBELIEVABLE! The man that came to fame by intellectually destroying one Brit on live T.V. was being trounced in an election with another.
I can’t believe I’m getting beaten by a Brit, @Nero. Revenge for @PiersMorgan? https://t.co/uuAnW8QRJK
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) November 16, 2015
As the election came down to the wire, I contacted the unions to drag people to the polls and get them to cast their ballots!
Keep on voting ppl! @benshapiro is strong on the issues but exit polls show @Nero connecting more w/the common man https://t.co/zxhedl1YtJ
— Kelly Campagna (@warriorwoman91) November 16, 2015
.@warriorwoman91 it’s gotta be @benshapiro. Don’t even know what the q is, but he’s the answer. Sorry, @Nero
— Moshe Hill (@themohill) November 16, 2015
Even my mom got involved!
@warriorwoman91 @benshapiro @Nero I learn a lot from Ben.
— Kim Campagna (@2bits4) November 16, 2015
While many of my own followers rallied for Shapiro, it was clear that Yiannopoulos’ cult following was much more passionate…and nefarious.
Keep on voting! Rumor has us that @Nero is bussing in illegals to solidify his lead. @benshapiro‘s camp cries foul! https://t.co/zxhedl1YtJ
— Kelly Campagna (@warriorwoman91) November 17, 2015
Never underestimate the ingenuity of a Brit, as Yiannopoulos’ hair pushed him far over the top in a crushing defeat of the man who made shapiroing a verb!
The question Breitbart readers all over the world want answered. @benshapiro @nero
— Kelly Campagna (@warriorwoman91) November 16, 2015
I announced Yiannopoulos’ victory to the masses, which was met with cries of joy and rapture from some and suspicion from others.
Yiannopoulos wins! @benshapiro supporters calling for recount; say @nero had unfair advantage w/his fabulous hair!https://t.co/zxhedl1YtJ
— Kelly Campagna (@warriorwoman91) November 17, 2015
In the end Shapiro conceded to the simple fact that in a Twitter election, hair is everything.
Brit w/ great hair > American with not-great hair https://t.co/QHIwH5i1J7
— Ben Shapiro (@benshapiro) November 17, 2015
In conclusion, based on my findings I would highly recommend all current and future presidential candidates immediately stampede to their hair stylists and bleach their hair Yiannopoulos blonde, as anything otherwise could cost them their elections too!